💬 participant tweets we love
The @replicats project is phenomenal! I participated last week by assessing replicability of meta-analysis claims. Was fascinating to see how others reach judgements and learnt about interesting synthesis methods which I hadn’t come across before https://t.co/SwJU9cSNDX
— Matthew Page (@mjpages) July 28, 2020
me, trying to replicate the in-person @replicats experience:
(sidenote: team box jelly #4 🏅🏆 wooo!!! congratulations, everyone! 🥳)#repliCATS2020 pic.twitter.com/Q44mWqL3sx
— james (he/mx.) 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ (@lysanderjames) May 19, 2020
#repliCATS2020 is over, but it was the most fun remote event ever I participated in so far. The award ceremony was the absolute highlight! 🥳As you can guess from the number of my claims, I already took part in the @replicats workshop at SIPS 2019 and I want to briefly review. pic.twitter.com/4NF0rg0s7v
— Julia Beitner (@JuliaBeitner) May 19, 2020
Happy Sundays with more claims @replicats #repliCATS2020 @DARPA #science pic.twitter.com/WUUCIi3G7P
— Suzan Dilara Tokac (@sdtokac) May 17, 2020
One of the things that struck me from @replicats, is the diversity in cues people used for their decisions, and the (seeming) consist individual differences in this – often reaching the same conclusion through different routes #SIPS2019
— Ben Farrar (@bg_farrar) July 6, 2019
Super excited to have been a part of the @replicats pre-SIPS workshop! A deeply cool project in which I feel I benefitted a good deal from participating. pic.twitter.com/SDP04x3IyC
— Grace Binion (@beercatphd) July 6, 2019
What did I learn at #SIPS2019 @replicats today? Assessing claims is anything but easy, super interesting how the strategies between people in one group can differ, and it’s amazing to benefit from the group knowledge and be able to update your evaluation after discussion.
— Julia Beitner (@JuliaBeitner) July 5, 2019
Great to meet some of the @replicats team, learn more about their international replication project & practice critical thinking & peer review skills. Thanks @HDR_HeSSA for organising! pic.twitter.com/SztDNfUjLy
— Aida Brydon (@aida_brydon) September 5, 2019
How exciting to be able to participate in this landmark study! 3000+ published research claims being assessed independently by ~5 experts and group discussion. @replicats pic.twitter.com/F6Cg7Pevn6
— Renee Otmar, PhD DE (@renee8otmar) November 6, 2019
The @replicats training materials is not just for replicats. Great introduction to essential statistical and meta-research concepts, with videos from @lakens https://t.co/M9IQQBcyzM
— Katie Drax (@katiedrax) July 5, 2019
And that’s a wrap! 20+ claims assessed for replicability in 1.5 days. Special thanks to @MartinJBush @fidlerfm @v_hemming and the rest of the @replicats team for making this a unique and enjoyable experience! pic.twitter.com/rS2ex0VajV
— Lina Koppel (@linakoppel) July 6, 2019
Had the best time facilitating for #repliCATS — super interesting and fun to assess claims with my awesome group! https://t.co/qq6Yadrduo
— Sophia Crüwell (@cruwelli) July 6, 2019
And here’s proof that we had TimTams, although I was so excited about the claims that I forgot to take proper pictures of that key element of the @replicats workshop 😂😂 pic.twitter.com/MWquvxNmtI
— Singapore ReproducibiliTea (@SingReproTea) December 17, 2019
Yesterday we evaluated 200 published papers from various disciplines (political science, education, law,etc.) to judge their replicability. Science is evolving and its amazing to be a part of it! Thank you @replicats #repliCATs #score #darpa #universitymelbourne #idea #aimos pic.twitter.com/45YIlFXKAD
— Suzan Dilara Toksc (@sdtokac) November 7, 2019